As can be predicted, the bigger B, the number of bootstrap resamples, the better the approximations are, thus much recent work has been devoted to `making the most' of the computations :
Preliminaries : Pivotal quantities
Construction of confidence intervals
is based (ideally) on a pivotal quantity
, that is a function of the sample
and the parameter
whose distribution
is independant of the parameter
, the sample, or any other unknown
parameter.
Thus for instance no knowledge
is needed about the parameters
and
of a normal variable
to construct
confidence intervals for
both of these parameters,
because one has two pivotal quantities available :
Let
denote the largest
quantile of the distribution of the
pivot
, and
the parameter space, set of all possible values for
then
is a confidence set whose level is
.
Thus if
,
and
denote the relevant quantiles
for the distributions cited above
the corresponding
confidence intervals
will be
and
Such an ideal situation is of course rare
and one has to do with approximate pivots,
(sometimes called roots).
Therefore errors will be made on
the level (
)
of the confidence sets.
Level error is sensitive to how far
is from being a pivot.
We will present several approaches for finding roots One approach is to studentize the root that is divide it by an estimate of its standard deviation. Another is to use a cdf transform constructed from a first set of bootstrap simulations.